Everything about The Mexican Revolution totally explained
The
Mexican Revolution (
Spanish:
Revolución Mexicana) was a major armed struggle that started with an uprising led by
Francisco I. Madero against longtime dictator
Porfirio Díaz. The first of the major revolutions of the 20th century, the Mexican Revolution was characterized by several
socialist,
liberal,
anarchist,
populist, and
agrarianist movements.
It progressed into a protracted and complicated civil war. It produced the
Mexican Constitution of 1917. The Revolution is generally considered to have lasted until 1920, although the country continued to have sporadic but comparatively minor outbreaks of rebellion in the 1920s, such as the
Cristero War. The Revolution triggered the creation of the
National Revolutionary Party in 1929 (renamed the Institutional Revolutionary Party or PRI in 1946). Putting forward a variety of leaders, the PRI held power and led the country until the
general election of 2000.
Porfirio Díaz's rule (1876-1910)
After
Benito Juárez’s death in 1872,
Porfirio Díaz wanted to take over as
Mexico’s leader. The two men were allies and had fought against the French in the
Battle of Puebla, but once Juárez rose to power, Díaz tried to unseat him. Díaz began his reign as president in 1876, and ruled until 1910 when
Francisco I. Madero succeeded him, taking office in 1911. Díaz’s regime is remembered for the advances he brought in industry and modernization, but at the expense of human rights and liberal reforms. He worked to reduce the power of the Catholic Church and expropriated some of their large property holdings.
The era of Porfirio Díaz’s government from 1876–1910 is known as the
Porfiriato. Díaz had a strict “No Re-election” policy in which presidents couldn't serve consecutive terms in office. He followed this rule when he stepped down after his first term and was succeeded by
Manuel González, one of his underlings. The new president’s period in office was marked by corruption and official incompetence. When Díaz ran in the next election, he was a welcome replacement. In future elections, Díaz would conveniently put aside his "No Re-election" slogan and run for president in every election.
Díaz became the dictator he'd warned the people against. Through the army, the
Rurales, and gangs of thugs, Diaz frightened people into voting for him. If bullying citizens into voting for him failed, he simply rigged the votes in his favor. Díaz knew he was violating the constitution, as well as his own liberal beliefs, by using force to stay in office. He justified his acts by claiming that Mexico wasn't yet ready to govern itself; only he knew what was best for his country, and he enforced his belief with a strong hand. "Order followed by Progress" were the watchwords of his rule.
While Díaz’s presidency was characterized by promotion of industry and the pacification of the country, it came at the expense of the working class, farmers and peasants, who suffered extreme exploitation. The economy took a great leap during the Porfiriato, especially through the encouragement of construction such as factories, roads, dams, industries, and better farms. This resulted in the rise of an urban
proletariat and the influx of foreign capital (principally from the
United States). Progress came at a price though, since civil liberties such as freedom of the press were suspended under the Porfiriato. The growing influence of the United States was a constant problem for Díaz, since a major portion of Mexico's land had earlier been lost to the United States in the
Mexican-American War.
Wealth, political power, and access to education were concentrated among a handful of families, overwhelmingly of European descent, who controlled much property in large estates. Most of the people in Mexico were landless. Foreign companies, mostly from the
United Kingdom,
France, and the United States, also exercised power in Mexico.
Díaz changed land reform efforts started under previous leaders. Díaz’s new land laws virtually undid all the hard work by leaders such as Juárez. No peasant or farmer could claim the land he occupied without formal legal title. Small farmers were helpless and angry; change of power would be necessary if Mexico was to continue being successful. From this cause, many leaders including
Francisco I. Madero,
Pancho Villa, and
Emiliano Zapata would launch a rebellion against Díaz, escalating into the eventual Mexican Revolution.
Most historians mark the end of the Porfiriato in 1911 as the beginning of the Mexican Revolution. In a 1908 interview with the U.S. journalist James Creelman, Díaz stated that Mexico was ready for democracy and elections and that he'd step down to allow other candidates to compete for the presidency. Growing "old and careless," Díaz figured he'd retire to
Europe and allow a younger man to take over his presidency. Because of the dissidence this caused, Díaz decided to run again in 1910 for the last time, with an eye toward arranging a succession in the middle of his term.
Madero decided to run against Díaz in 1910. Diaz thought he could control the election as he'd the previous seven. Although similar overall to Díaz in his ideology, unlike Díaz, Madero hoped for other elites to rule alongside the President. Díaz, however, didn't approve of Madero and had him jailed on election day in 1910. Díaz was announced the winner of the election by a landslide, providing the initial impetus for the outbreak of the Revolution.
Francisco I. Madero's presidency (1911-1913)
Francisco I. Madero, a young man from a wealthy family in the northern state of
Coahuila, stated in 1910 that he'd be running in the next election against Díaz for the presidency. In order to ensure that Madero didn't win, Díaz had Madero thrown in jail and then declared himself the winner. Madero soon escaped and fled for a short period of time to
Texas,
United States. On
October 5,
1910, Madero issued a "letter from jail" called the
Plan de San Luis Potosí, with its main slogan "free suffrage and no re-election." It declared the Díaz regime illegal and called for revolt against Díaz to overthrow the Porfiriato, starting on
November 20. Though Madero's letter wasn't a plan for major socioeconomic revolution, it offered the hope of change for many disadvantaged Mexicans.
Madero's vague promises of
agrarian reforms attracted many of the peasants throughout Mexico. He was able to gain much needed support from them in order to remove Díaz from power. With the support of the mostly peasant Indians, Madero's army fought Díaz's army and had some success. Díaz's army gradually lost control of Mexico and his administration started to fall apart. The desire to remove Díaz was so great that many natives and different leaders supported of Madero and fought on his side.
In late 1910, revolutionary movements broke out in response to Madero's letter.
Pascual Orozco along with governor
Abraham González formed a powerful military union in the north and took
Mexicali and
Chihuahua City, although they were not especially committed to Madero. These victories encouraged other military and political alliances, including
Pancho Villa. Against Madero's wishes, Orozco and Villa fought for and won Ciudad Juárez, bordering
El Paso, Texas, along the
Rio Grande.
After Madero defeated the weak federal army, on
May 21,
1911, he signed the
Treaty of Ciudad Juárez with Diaz. It stated that Díaz would abdicate his rule and be replaced by Madero. Insisting on a new election, Madero won overwhelmingly in late 1911. Some supporters criticized him for appearing weak by not assuming the presidency and failing to pass immediate reforms. But Madero established a liberal democracy and received support from the United States and popular leaders such as Orozco, Villa, and Zapata.
Madero was a weak leader and quickly lost much of his support while in power. He angered both the more radical revolutionists and the conservative counter-revolutionists, including the unpopular Congress elected during Díaz's rule. His refusal to enact land reforms caused a break with Zapata who announced the
Plan de Ayala, which called for the return of lands "usurped by the hacendados" (
hacienda owners) and demanded an armed conflict against the government. Soon after, Orozco also broke away from Madero's government and rebelled against him. He created his own army of Orozquistas, who were also called the Colorados ("Red Flaggers") after Madero refused to agree to social reforms calling for better working hours, pay, and conditions. The rural working class, who had supported Madero, now took up arms supporting Zapata and Orozco. The people's support for Madero quickly deteriorated.
Madero's time as leader was short lived and came to an end after General
Victoriano Huerta set in motion a
coup d'état. Madero had appointed Huerta as commander-in-chief when he first claimed power, but Huerta had turned against him. Following Huerta’s coup d'état, Madero was forced to resign in 1913. Madero and vice president
José María Pino Suárez were both assassinated less than a week later. The murder of Madero ruptured the country, but he became honored as a martyr of the revolution.
Victoriano Huerta's reign
In early 1913, Victoriano Huerta, who commanded the armed forces, conspired with
U.S. Ambassador Henry Lane Wilson,
Félix Díaz and
Bernardo Reyes, to remove Madero from power.
La decena trágica was an event, in which ten days of sporadic fighting in a faked battle occurred between federal troops led by Huerta and Díaz’s conservative rebel forces. This fighting would stop when Huerta, Félix Díaz, and Henry Lane Wilson met and signed the "Embassy Pact" in which they agreed to conspire against Madero to install Huerta as president.
When Huerta gained power and became president, most powers around the world acknowledged him as the rightful leader. However, incoming-president of the United States
Woodrow Wilson refused to recognize Huerta's government. Henry Lane Wilson was withdrawn as U.S. Ambassador by Woodrow Wilson and his secretary of state
William Jennings Bryan, to be replaced by
John Lind, a
Swedish-American socialist. Bryan, President Wilson, and many Mexicans saw Huerta as an illegal usurper of presidential power in violation of the
Constitution of Mexico.
Venustiano Carranza, a politician and rancher from
Coahuila, was forefront in the opposition against Huerta, calling his forces the Constitutionalists, with the secret support of the United States. On
March 26,
1913, Carranza issued the
Plan de Guadalupe, which was a refusal to recognize Huerta as president and called for a declaration of war between the two factions. Leaders such as Villa, Zapata, Carranza, and
Álvaro Obregón led the fighting against Huerta. In April of 1914, U.S. opposition to Huerta had reached its peak when
American forces seized and occupied the port of
Veracruz, cutting off arms and money supplies from the
German Empire. In late July, this situation worsened for Huerta. He vacated his office and fled to
Puerto México.
Legacy
After Huerta vacated the presidency, he moved to Spain in an attempt to establish a new home. Later he returned to Mexico to try to establish another
counter-revolution within the post-revolutionary Mexican state.
The German Empire, which favored Huerta while in power, considered him an important factor related to the war breaking out in Europe (
World War I). If Huerta could establish himself again as leader of Mexico, which was the German government's goal, the United States would be distracted on its homefront, giving the Germans an advantage in Europe. Huerta moved to the United States where he began to work toward another revolution in Mexico. The German government gave him funding and advice.
The U.S government and Carranza, the newly elected President of Mexico, were worried when Huerta arrived. They set up
surveillance to watch Huerta and try to ensure he didn't gain entry into Mexico. The United States government and Carranza wanted to prevent another counter-revolution. .
Huerta didn't survive long enough to re-enter into Mexico. He was stopped at the border in
El Paso, Texas, by the United States government and kept there under house arrest. He died in early 1916.
Pancho Villa
José Doroteo Arango Arámbula, better known as Francisco "Pancho" Villa, came from the northern state of
Durango. He was one of the leaders of the Mexican Revolution. Villa with his army of Villistas joined the ranks of the Madero movement. He led the Villistas in many battles, such as the attack of
Ciudad Juárez in 1911 (which overthrew Porfirio Díaz and gave Madero power), the
Battle of Celaya.
In 1911, Victoriano Huerta appointed Villa his chief military commander. During this period Huerta and Villa became rivals. In 1912 when Villa's men seized a horse and Villa decided to keep it for himself, Huerta ordered Villa’s execution for insubordination. Raúl Madero, brother of the former president, intervened to save Villa's life. Jailed in Mexico City, Villa escaped to the United States. Soon after the assassination of President Madero, Villa returned with a group of companions to fight Huerta. By 1913 the group had become Villa's División del Norte (Northern Division). This army led by Villa had numerous American members. Villa and his army, along with
Carranza and
Obregón, joined in resistance to the Huerta dictatorship.
Villa and Carranza had different goals. Because Villa wanted to continue the revolution, he became an enemy of Carranza. After Carranza took control in 1914, Villa and other revolutionaries who opposed him met at what was called the
Convention of Aguascalientes. The convention deposed Carranza in favor of
Eulalio Gutiérrez. In the winter of 1914, Villa and Zapata's troops entered and occupied
Mexico City. Villa's treatment of Gutiérrez and the citizenry outraged more moderate elements of the population, who forced Villa from the city in early 1915. He was replaced as head of the country by Obregón and Carranza.
In 1915, Villa took part in two of the most important battles during the revolution, the two engagements in the
Battle of Celaya, on April 6–7 and from April 13–15. Obregon defeated Villa in the Battle of Celaya, one of the bloodiest of the revolution. Carranza emerged as the winner of the war and seized power. A short time after, the United States recognized Carranza as president of Mexico. On
March 9,
1916, Villa crossed the United States–Mexico border and raided
Columbus, New Mexico in a desperate attempt to have the United States intervene and weaken the Carranza administration. During this attack, 18 Americans were killed as well as 90 of Villa's men. The United States began to look at Villa as more of a bandit than a revolutionary.
Pressured by Texans to confront Mexican lawlessness, US President Wilson sent General
John J. Pershing and 10,000 U.S. troops on an unsuccessful pursuit to capture Villa. It was known as the
Punitive Expedition. After nearly a year of fighting local rebels, Pershing was called off and given command of the
American Expeditionary Force in
World War I.
In 1920, Obregón finally signed a peace treaty with Villa, who retired from the revolution. In 1923 Villa was assassinated by gunfire while traveling in his car.
Venustiano Carranza (1914-1920)
Venustiano Carranza became president in 1914, after the overthrow of the Huerta government. He was driven out of
Mexico City by Villa and Zapata in 1915, but later gained the support of the masses by the development of a program of social and agrarian reform. He was elected president of Mexico in 1917. To try to restrain the revolutionary slaughter, Carranza formed the
Constitutional Army to try to bring peace by adoption of the majority of rebel social demands into the new constitution. He reluctantly incorporated most of these demands into the new
Constitution of 1917. The
socialist constitution addressed foreign ownership of resources, an organized labor code, the role of the
Roman Catholic Church in education, and
land reform.
Although his intentions were good, Carranza wasn't able to stay in power long enough to enforce many of the reforms in the Constitution of 1917. There was greater decentralization of power because of his weakness. He had appointed General Obregón as Minister of War and of the Navy. In 1920, Obregón with other leading generals
Plutarco Elías Calles and
Adolfo de la Huerta led a revolt against Carranza. Their forces assassinated Carranza on
May 21,
1920.
Emiliano Zapata (active 1910-1919)
Emiliano Zapata Salazar was a leading figure in the Mexican Revolution. He is considered one of the outstanding national heroes of Mexico: towns, streets, and housing developments called "Emiliano Zapata" are common across the country. His image has been used on
Mexican banknotes. People have long taken different sides on their evaluation of Emiliano Zapata and his followers. Some considered them bandits, but to others they were true revolutionaries who worked for the peasants. Presidents
Porfirio Díaz and
Venustiano Carranza called Zapata a womanizer, barbarian, terrorist, and a bandit. Conservative media nicknamed Zapata "The Attila of the South."
Peasant and indigenous Mexicans admired Zapata as a practical revolutionary whose populist battle cry "
Tierra y Libertad" (Land and Liberty) was elaborated in the
Plan de Ayala for land reform. He fought for political and economic emancipation of the peasants in Southern Mexico. Zapata was killed in 1919 by General
Pablo González and his aide Colonel
Jesús Guajardo in an elaborate ambush. Guajardo set up the meeting under the pretext of wanting to defect to Zapata's side. At the meeting, Gonzalez's men assassinated Zapata.
Zapatistas
Zapatista originally referred to a member of the revolutionary
guerrilla movement founded about 1910 by Zapata. His
Liberation Army of the South (Ejército Libertador del Sur) fought during the Mexican Revolution for the
redistribution of agricultural land. Zapata and his army and allies, including
Pancho Villa, fought for agrarian reform in Mexico. Specifically they wanted to establish
communal land rights for Mexico's
indigenous population, which had mostly lost its land to the wealthy elite of European descent.
The majority of Zapata’s supporters were indigenous peasants from
Morelos and surrounding areas. But intellectuals from urban areas also joined the
Zapatistas and played a significant part in their movement, specifically the structure and communication of the
Zapatista ambitions. Zapata had received only a few years of limited education in Morelos. Educated supporters helped express his political aims. The urban intellectuals were known as "city boys" and were predominantly young males. They joined the
Zapatistas for many reasons, including curiosity, sympathy, and ambition.
Zapata agreed that intellectuals could work on political strategy, but he'd the chief role in proclaiming
Zapatista ideology. The city boys also provided medical care, helped promote and instruct supporters in
Zapatista ideology, created a plan for agrarian reform, aided in rebuilding villages destroyed by government forces, wrote manifestos, and sent messages from Zapata to other revolutionary leaders. Zapata's
compadre Otilio Montaño was one of the most prominent city boys. Before the Revolution, Montaño was a professor. During the Revolution he taught
Zapatismo, recruited citizens, and wrote the
Plan de Ayala for land reform. Other well-known city boys were
Abraham Martínez,
Manuel Palafox,
Antonio Díaz Soto y Gama,
Pablo Torres Burgos,
Gildardo Magaña,
Dolores Jiménez y Muro,
Enrique Villa, and
Genaro Amezcua.
Zapatista women
Many women were involved with and supported the
Zapatistas. Since Zapata's political ambitions and campaign were usually local, the women were able to aid the
Zapatista soldiers from their homes. There were also female
Zapatista soldiers who served from the beginning of the revolution. When Zapata met with President Madero on
July 12,
1911, he was accompanied by his troops. Amongst these troops were female soldiers, including officers. Some women also led bandit gangs before and during the Revolution. Women joined the
Zapatistas as soldiers for various reasons, including revenge for dead family members or to perform raids. Perhaps the most popular
Zapatista female soldier was
Margarita Neri, who was a commander. Women fought bravely as
Zapatista soldiers and some were killed in battle. Many survivors continued to wear men's clothing and carry pistols long after the Revolution ended. Colonel
María de la Luz Espinosa Barrera was one of the few whose service was formally recognized with a pension as a veteran of the Mexican Revolution.
Agrarian land reform
Under the Porfiriato, the rural peasants suffered the most. The regime confiscated large sections of land which resulted in a major loss of land by the agrarian work force. In 1883 a land law was passed which gave ownership of more than 27.5 million hectares of land to foreign companies. By 1894, one out of every five acres of Mexican land was owned by a foreign interest. Many wealthy families also owned large estates, resulting in landless rural peasants working on the property as virtual slaves. In 1910 at the beginning of the revolution, about one half the rural population lived and worked on such
plantations.
Women in the revolution
Women during the Mexican Revolution (known as
soldaderas, adelitas, or
coronelas) were held under the shadow of men and occupied the roles of wife and ultimate care givers. In the cash-strapped armies of Revolution, male soldiers brought their women with them as a matter of course. There was almost no support for duties of
mess,
quartermaster, and
medics), roles filled by women. The
Constitutionalists Army tended to view women in more traditional roles. But some wealthy women such as Colonel Juana Flores, widow of a gold-mine owner, purchased officers' commissions from Carranza.
The 1884 Civil Code restricted women at home and in the workplace. The Code created inequalities amongst women and ethnic minorities who suffered politically, socially, economically and religiously under the Porfirian regime. For decades myths portrayed Mexican women as passive beings who contributed minimally to the Mexican Revolution. Mexican women were in fact active participants in the Mexican Revolution, one of the recognized social uprisings of the twentieth century.
Women's involvement in the revolution had an immense impact on shaping Mexican society during the revolutionary period. Mexican women were essential to the revolution in a number of ways. They were involved in politics, were strong advocates for the causes, and participated in life on the battlefields. The female political figures were probably the most important and influential women in the Mexican Revolution. They were prominent political activists, thinkers, writers, figures, role models, and were fearless in their pursuit of their goals, which often resulted in their being jailed. The Mexican Revolution included many movements focusing on dealing with the urban and middle class societies, whose ascent resulted in a new
Revolutionary Constitution in 1917.
United States' involvement
The U.S. relationship with Mexico has often been turbulent. During the Mexican independence movement, the U.S. assisted the Mexican insurgents in achieving independence, using the
Monroe Doctrine as the justification. With the reign of dictators such as
Iturbide and
Santa Anna, the U.S.-Mexico relationship deteriorated. When the liberal president
Benito Juárez came to power with his agenda for a democratic Mexican society, President Lincoln personally commended him and sent supplies to help Juárez overthrow emperor
Maximilian I of Mexico. This support during the US Civil War ended with the upheaval following Lincoln's assassination. After the death of Juarez, Mexico reverted to a totalitarian government under the rule of Porfirio Diaz.
At the turn of the 20th Century, United States owners, including major companies, held about twenty-seven percent of Mexican land. By 1910 American industrial investment was 45 percent, which was why presidents Taft and Wilson decided to intervene in Mexican affairs. For both economic and political reasons, the U.S. government generally supported the man in power(President Wilson did condemn Huerta's murders of Madero and Piño Suarez). Twice during the Revolution, the U.S. sent troops into Mexico. The first time was in 1914, during the
Ypiranga incident. When US agents discovered that the German merchant ship
Ypiranga was carrying illegal arms to Huerta, President Wilson ordered troops to the port of Veracruz to stop the ship from docking. He didn't declare war on Mexico. The U.S. troops then carried out a skirmish against Huerta's forces in Veracruz. The
Ypiranga managed to dock at another port, which infuriated Wilson. The
ABC Powers arbitrated and U.S. troops left Mexican soil, but the incident added to already tense U.S.-Mexico relations.
In 1916, in retaliation for Pancho Villa's raid on Columbus, New Mexico, and the death of 16 American citizens, President Wilson sent Brigadier General John J. Pershing into Mexico to capture Villa. Villa was deeply entrenched in the mountains of northern Mexico, and knew the terrain too well to be captured by the U.S. forces. General Pershing was forced to abandon the mission and return to the U.S. This event, however, further damaged the strained U.S.-Mexico relationship and caused Mexico's anti-American sentiment to grow stronger. Some historians believed the United States government invested too much in the Mexican issue and violated its own avowed neutrality.
The Catholic Church during the revolution
During the period of 1876 to 1911, relations between the
Roman Catholic Church and the
Mexican government were stable.
Porfirio Díaz had a keen interest in relations with the
church since he was worried about the
American expansionist threat.
Porfirio Díaz has been quoted as saying:
» “Persecution of the
Church, whether or not the
clergy enter into the matter, means
war, and such a war that the Government can win it only against its own people, through the humiliating, despotic, costly and dangerous support of the United States. Without its
religion, Mexico is irretrievably lost.”
However, Porfirio Díaz wasn't completely supportive of the Catholic Church. Before his own presidency, Diaz had supported the Juarez regime, which implemented anti-clerical policies, such as expropriation of large tracts of Church-owned property.
Youth movement
As the Revolution progressed, the status of the University in relation to it changed several times; each time its students took different positions as well. Under different university directors, different revolutionary ideals were forced upon the student body. In many cases the curriculum would change as well. With each change, however, the importance of youth groups became more crucial. The university’s students made up the bulk of the youth movement, chiefly composed of educated youth. During the Revolution, some viewed students as anti-revolutionary because of the image of the university as a safe haven for the rich and privileged. People engaged in the Revolution urged the university and students to become more involved and to accept the ideals and beliefs of the revolution.
The
National University of Mexico was founded by Gabino Barreda, who served as the Secretary of Public Instruction under Porfirio Díaz. Despite the school's support for higher education for Mexicans, it was continually attacked during the revolution. In 1912 porfiristas and liberals joined in an attempt to suppress the students' influence. The first to organize were the medical students in 1910, the year the revolution began.
The youth movements of the revolution were mainly confined to higher schools and especially the
National University of Mexico. Young men used art, music, and poetry to speak out on the Revolution and encourage support. The leaders in government often made efforts to suppress such outlets. After the Revolution, new governments in turn gradually tried to suppress the freedoms of the University. By the 1920s, student protests were against the government.
End of the revolution
Historians debate the exact end of the "revolutionary period". From a military standpoint, it ended with the death of the
Constitutional Army's
primer jefe (First Chief) Venustiano Carranza in 1920, and the ascension to power of General
Álvaro Obregón. Coup attempts and sporadic uprisings continued, for instance in the
Cristero Wars of 1926-1929.
Effective implementation of the social provisions of the 1917
Constitution of Mexico and near cession of revolutionary activity didn't occur until the administration of
Lázaro Cárdenas (1934-1940). Cárdenas also abolished
capital punishment, better known in Mexico as
fusilamiento, death by
firing squad. Cárdenas and the PRM's ability to control the republic without summary executions showed the revolutionary period was at its end.
Another major step was in 1940, when Cardenas voluntarily relinquished all power to his successor
Manuel Ávila Camacho, a legal transition that was unprecedented in Mexican history. In 1942, Ávila Camacho and all living ex-
Presidents appeared on stage in the
Mexico City Zócalo, in front of the
Palacio Nacional, to encourage the Mexican people to support the Americans and British in
World War II. This demonstration of political solidarity among diverse elements signaled the true end of the Revolution. Given its importance in national history, Mexican politicians and political parties refer frequently to the Revolution in their political rhetoric.
Bibliography
» Many portions of this article are translations of excerpts from the article in the Spanish Wikipedia.
General
- Britton, John A. Revolution and Ideology Images of the Mexican Revolution in the United States. Louisville: The University Press of Kentucky, 1995.
- Chasteen, John.Born In Blood and Fire: A Concise History of Latin America. New York: W.W. Norton, 2001.
- Cockcroft, James D. Intellectual Precursors of the Mexican Revolution 1900- 1913. Austin: Von Boeckmann-Jones Company, 1968.
- Craven, David. Art and Revolution in Latin America 1910-1990. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.
- Doremus, Anne T. Culture, Politics, and National Identity in Mexican Literature and Film, 1929-1952. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc., 2001.
- Documents on the Mexican Revolution Vol.1 Part 1. ed. Gene Z. Hanrahan. North Carolina: Documentary Publications, 1976
- Foster, David, W., ed. Mexican Literature A History. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1994.
- Gonzales, Michael J. "The Mexican Revolution: 1910-1940" Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2002.
- Hauss Charles, Smith Miriam, "Comparative Politics", Nelson Thomson Learning, Copyright 2000
- Hoy, Terry. "Octavio Paz: The Search for Mexican Identity." The Review of Politics 44:3 (July, 1982), 370-385.
- Macias, Anna. "Women and the Mexican Revolution, 1910-1920." The Americas, 37:1 (Jul., 1980), 53-82.
- Mora, Carl J., Mexican Cinema: Reflections of a Society 1896-2004. Berkeley: University of California Press, 3rd edition, 2005
- Meyer, Jean A. The Cristero Rebellion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976, pp. 10-15
- Myers, Berbard S. Mexican Painting in Our Time. New York: Oxford University Press, 1956.
- Orellana, Margarita de, Filming Pancho Villa: How Hollywood Shaped the Mexican Revolution: North American Cinema and Mexico, 1911-1917. New York: Verso, 2007
- Paranagua, Paula Antonio. Mexican Cinema. London: British Film Institute, 1995.
- Quirk, Robert E. The Mexican Revolution and the Catholic Church 1910-1919. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1973, pp.1-249
- Reséndez Fuentes, Andrés. "Battleground Women: Soldaderas and Female Soldiers in the Mexican Revolution." The Americas 51, 4 (April 1995).
- Smith, Robert Freeman. The United States and Revolutionary Nationalism in Mexico 1916-1932. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972
- Soto, Shirlene Ann. Emergence of the Modern Mexican Woman. Denver: Arden Press, 1990.
- Swanson, Julia. "Murder in Mexico." History Today, June 2004. Vol.54, Issue 6; p 38-45
- Turner, Frederick C. "The Compatibility of Church and State in Mexico." Journal of Inter-American Studies, Vol 9, No 4, 1967, pp.591-602
- Weinstock, Herbert. "Carlos Chavez." The Musical Quarterly 22:4 (Oct., 1936), 435-445.
Online
Brunk, Samuel. The Banditry of Zapatismo in the Mexican Revolution. The American Historical Review. Washington: April 1996, Volume 101, Issue 2, Page 331. Online Source: (External Link
)
Brunk, Samuel. "Zapata and the City Boys: In Search of a Piece of Revolution." Hispanic American Historical Review. Duke University Press, 1993. Online Source: (External Link
)
“From Soldaderas to Comandantes.” Zapatista Direct Solidarity Committee. University of Texas. Online Source: (External Link
)
Gilbert, Dennis. "Emiliano Zapata: Textbook Hero." Mexican Studies. Berkley: Winter 2003, Volume 19, Issue 1, Page 127. Online Source: (External Link
)
Hardman, John. "Postcards of the Mexican Revolution" (External Link
)
Merewether Charles, Collections Curator, Getty Research Institute, "Mexico: From Empire to Revolution", Jan. 2002. Original Online Source:(External Link
)
Rausch George Jr. "The Exile and Death of Victoriano Huerta", The Hispanic American Historical Review, Vol. 42, No. 2, May 1963 pp. 133-151. Original Online Source: (External Link
)
Tannenbaum, Frank. “Land Reform in Mexico”. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 150, Economics of World Peace (July 1930), 238-247. Online Source : (External Link
)
Tuck, Jim. "Zapata and the Intellectuals." Mexico Connect, 1996- 2006. Online Source: (External Link
)
Welker, Grenn. "Emiliano Zapata: The Father of the Zapatista Movement." Online Source: (External Link
)
Further Information
Get more info on 'Mexican Revolution'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://mexican_revolution.totallyexplained.com">Mexican Revolution Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |